Andrew Windsor Branded 'Deluded' Over Belief His 'Secret Correspondence' With Jeffrey Epstein Could 'Prove His Innocence'

RadarOnline.com can reveal Andrew Windsor has been branded "deluded" by insiders over his belief undisclosed correspondence with Jeffrey Epstein will clear his name, as the former prince prepares for a high-stakes legal battle over allegations tied to his public role.

The ex-Duke of York, 66, was arrested last month at his home on the Sandringham estate in Norfolk on suspicion of misconduct in public office linked to his time as the United Kingdom's trade envoy between 2001 and 2011. He was later released under investigation.

The allegations center on claims he shared sensitive information during dealings with his late pal, the convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein – an offense that could carry severe penalties if proven.

King Charles, 77, said publicly following the arrest that authorities would receive full cooperation, adding that "the law must take its course."

A source close to the legal process said, "Among those working around Andrew Windsor, there is an increasing concern that he has locked onto this belief that a specific set of documents will act as a silver bullet for his defense.

"From his perspective, these materials hold the key to clearing his name, but others involved in the case view that as a very narrow and potentially misguided interpretation of what is, in reality, a highly complex and multi-layered legal situation."

The insider added: "He appears absolutely convinced that once these documents are disclosed, they will dramatically shift how the allegations are perceived, almost as if they will reset the entire narrative in his favor.

"However, there is a growing unease among advisers that he is becoming totally deluded and disappearing down a rabbit hole as he may be overestimating both their significance and their ability to carry the kind of legal weight he is expecting. In cases like this, evidence rarely operates in isolation, and there is concern he is placing far too much reliance on one element rather than the broader picture."