#NYT: US mineral deal offers no security guarantees for Ukraine
![]() The current U.S. proposal regarding Ukraine's critical minerals seeks 50% of revenues from Ukraine's natural resources while offering no security guarantees in return, according to a draft of the agreement seen by the New York Times (NYT). The terms of the revised draft are virtually the same as those of an earlier version rejected by President Volodymyr Zelensky, the NYT reported, citing a draft of the agreement dated Feb. 21. In some cases, the U.S. demands are even more stringent. The agreement demands 50% of revenues from Ukraine's natural resources, including critical minerals, oil, and gas, as well as stakes in ports and other key infrastructure through a joint investment fund. The new version says that the U.S. would hold a 100% financial interest in this fund, and that Ukraine should contribute to the fund until it reaches $500 billion. When Zelensky then refused to sign the proposed agreement on the grounds that it offered no security guarantees, Trump lashed out at the Ukrainian president, echoing Kremlin talking points by calling him an "unelected dictator." |
Rutte։ "Ukraine's path to NATO membership is irreversible"
202Yesterday, 18:21Dmitriev: "Vance understands that Europe's main problem is not Russia"
225Yesterday, 15:27Callas: "Rubio guaranteed US won't make concessions to Russia in talks
193Yesterday, 14:57State Department: "A peace treaty between Azerbaijan and Armenia will open a new era of security and prosperity for the entire South Caucasus"
223Yesterday, 14:03"Opening the borders of Armenia with Turkey and Azerbaijan could radically change the situation" - Von der Leyen
245Yesterday, 13:15Genser: "A deal for the release of Armenian Christian POWs must be a precondition to a peace deal moving forward"
186Yesterday, 12:55